Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: cookedw Date: Jan 26, 2008 10:46am
Forum: etree Subject: New FLAC version? Fixed 24-bit bug?

Sorry if this is a double post...I responded to a much older thread in October, so it doesn't appear on the front page.

There was a glitch with 24-bit files encoded with 1.2.1 because the LMA was(is?) using version 1.1.2. It was basically coming up with a false positive. Is this still the case? I just upgraded to 1.2.1, and I'm wondering if I should just go back to 1.1.4 for compatibility issues.

Is the LMA still using 1.1.2?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffTyler Date: Jan 26, 2008 5:43pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: New FLAC version? Fixed 24-bit bug?

I think the LMA is still using the old version. thanks for refreshing the issue. I'll follow up with the engineers. We really should be using the new version.

Tyler

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: mmedley Date: Feb 26, 2008 7:58am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: New FLAC version? Fixed 24-bit bug?

Could the LMA make this a priority please????

I should not have to revert to older software or uploading 24bit material for a 2nd time.


Thanks,

m

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffTyler Date: Jan 31, 2008 9:35am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: New FLAC version? Fixed 24-bit bug?

yes it is still using the old version. If you are uploading 24 bit files, please don't encode with 1.2.X as it will cause problems on the LMA side. Sorry, we are working on upgrading, but it is a very large task it seems to do that.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cookedw Date: Jan 31, 2008 9:58am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: New FLAC version? Fixed 24-bit bug?

Weird - I would have thought the deriver talking to a new executable would've been pretty straightforward. Thanks so much for the update. I don't do much 24-bit encoding, so I'm going to stick with 1.2.1 for now just for its speed/efficiency, and when I decide to do some more 24-bit stuff, then I guess I'll just encode with the old one.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)